Why did Pelias agree to restore Jason to sovereignty after Jason retrieved the Golden Fleece?

• A. Pelias admired Jason's bravery.
• B. He believed no one would attempt the quest and return alive.
• C. The gods commanded him to do so.
• D. Jason threatened him with vengeance.

Answer: (B)

Pelias’ action is driven by political calculation and a desire to protect his hold on the throne. By demanding that Jason recover the Golden Fleece, he creates a test that makes the throne’s future depend on a heroic achievement. He believes the task is so formidable that no one could actually complete it and return alive, so presenting sovereignty as a reward for success lets him keep the throne unless someone does something nearly impossible. When Jason does bring back the fleece, he is moved to honor the bargain, and Jason is restored to kingship as promised. The other ideas don’t fit the situation: there isn’t a motive of admiration, divine command, or threat against Pelias driving the decision in that moment. The underlying motive is protective pragmatism—hiding behind a perilous quest to avoid losing power while leaving a breach to be filled only by a proven hero.